Consultation closes 5pm, Wed 5 Aug

Have your say on the Celbridge Road.

Kildare County Council is planning an active travel scheme for the Celbridge Road — the road that serves two primary schools and that most parents won't let their children cycle on. It's a real improvement. We don't think it goes far enough. Until 5pm on Wednesday 5 August anyone can tell the council what they think, and the number of submissions matters.

Why this road

Right now, the Celbridge Road suppresses cycling

Two primary schools sit on this road. Plenty of the families who attend them live close enough to walk or cycle — and drive anyway, because the road doesn't feel safe enough to do otherwise. The result is a school run made of cars, on a road congested by the school run.

Ireland's own street design manual puts people on foot at the top of the pecking order, then people on bikes, then cars. This design still puts cars first. We support the scheme — we just don't think it is yet good enough to change how anyone travels.

Kildare County Council's visualisation of the proposed Celbridge Road: red cycle
                   tracks on both sides, separated from two lanes of traffic by a white line and a low
                   kerb. A young child cycles on the left-hand track as a car passes alongside.
This is the council's own picture of the proposed road. Look at the child on the left: a painted line and a kerb are all that stand between them and the car.Viewpoint 6, Celbridge Road Active Travel Scheme photomontages — Kildare County Council / AtkinsRéalis.

Our position

What we're asking for

We welcome the scheme. These are the changes we believe it needs — and you're welcome to use any of them in your own submission.

  1. Don't leave out the missing link

    The scheme skips the stretch between the Rail Park and the Straffan Road. No land needs to be bought — a Section 38 order would cover it — so the gap is a choice rather than a constraint. A route is only as good as its weakest point.

  2. Put something between children and the traffic

    Along the open road, all that separates a child on a bike from passing traffic is a kerb 50–75mm high — light segregation, with no buffer behind it. Good design is forgiving: a wobble shouldn't be fatal. We accept there isn't room everywhere, but over a significant part of this scheme there plainly is.

  3. Two ways to make room for that buffer

    We'd prefer the first: make the Celbridge Road one-way outbound for cars, and let the Griffin Rath road and the new Eastern Ring Road — both built to a higher standard — carry the through traffic. That would also give drivers more green time at the Straffan Road lights. The alternative is to drop the southern cycle lane and turn Laurence's Avenue and the Rail Park into school streets. Either frees the space, and we would take either.

Road cross-sections comparedAs proposed, the Celbridge Road has a footpath, a cycle track, two 3.15-metre traffic lanes, a second cycle track and a second footpath, with nothing separating the cycle tracks from the traffic. What the campaign asks for uses the same overall width, but replaces one of the two traffic lanes with a 1.5-metre planted buffer on each side, between the cycle tracks and the remaining lane.AS PROPOSEDFootpathCycleTraffic3.15mTraffic3.15mCycleFootpath▲ no bufferno buffer ▲WHAT WE'RE ASKING FORFootpathCycleBufferTrafficone wayBufferCycleFootpathsame road width — no land purchase needed
Dropping one traffic lane pays for a buffer on both sides, within the road we already have. Our second option reaches the same place differently: take out the southern cycle track and send those riders along Laurence's Avenue and the Rail Park as school streets, and the space that frees does the same job.
The same stretch of the Celbridge Road with one lane of traffic instead of
                 two. A planted strip now runs between each red cycle track and the
                 carriageway, so the child cycling on the left is no longer beside the car.
The same view, with one traffic lane instead of two. The child on the left now has a planted strip between them and the passing car.Our edit of the council's Viewpoint 6, showing what we are asking for. The underlying photomontage is Kildare County Council / AtkinsRéalis; the changes to it are ours.
  1. Narrow the traffic lanes, not the space for people

    At 3.15m each, the traffic lanes are 0.3m wider than the TII standard for a regional road. Wider lanes mean faster driving, and faster driving means worse injuries — on a road with two primary schools on it, that is the wrong way round. Road deaths are rising nationally, and the Road Safety Authority reports that almost half of those killed are vulnerable road users.

  2. Entrance kerbs at every side road

    Where the footpath and cycle track cross a side road, both should carry on across it over an entrance kerb, whose steep rise makes drivers slow and leaves priority with the people going straight on. The National Transport Authority specifies exactly this. These drawings show raised tables instead, which hand the priority back to turning drivers — and entrance kerbs have been available from Irish suppliers since 2025, with Dublin City Council already using them.

  3. Design for people who find the road hardest

    Shared space should be a designer's last choice, not the first. People cycling at 16–20km/h do not belong beside people on foot: on the Celbridge Road today, adults already ride on the footpath because the road frightens them. Give each group protected space of its own and the road becomes usable for the wheelchair and mobility-scooter users who avoid it now.

  4. Show the health and economic case

    The council models the traffic and the costs when it builds a road, and road schemes reliably pass that test. The World Health Organisation's H.E.A.T. tool does the same arithmetic for walking and cycling — carbon saved, health costs avoided, early deaths prevented. More than seventy countries use it. Kildare should apply it here.

Three steps

How to make your own submission

It does not have to be long, formal or technical. Councils count and read every submission they receive, and a short one from a local resident counts the same as a long one.

Read the plans

Everything is on the council's portal. The photomontages are the quickest way in — they show what the road would actually look like.

Write what you actually think

A few honest sentences from a local resident carry real weight. Say where you live and how the road affects you. Personal experience persuades more than technical language.

Send it before the deadline

Submit through the portal, quoting planning reference P82026.02. Late submissions cannot be considered, and submissions become part of the public planning record.

Part 8 — Proposed Celbridge Road Active Travel Scheme, Maynooth
Planning reference P82026.02 · Kildare County Council · Closes 5pm on Wednesday 5 August 2026

Open the consultation →

Add your voice. Join the campaign.

Every member makes us stronger when we ask for safer streets — and keeps us independent and locally funded. Membership starts at €30 a year.